8. |
A 2023-01-01 07:49:37 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Quiet |
7. |
A* 2022-12-24 20:02:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
OK. Does this work? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>wearing a face mask (to avoid upsetting others during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a face mask solely to avoid upsetting others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss> |
6. |
A* 2022-12-24 08:04:51 Marcus Richert
|
|
Comments: |
I don't think the base gloss should just be "wearing a face mask", I don't think the entirety of 忖度 should be in brackets. |
5. |
A 2022-12-24 04:02:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I think this is cleaner and reduces parenthesized bits. The "only" is really implied. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>wearing a face mask (only) to not potentially upset others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a face mask (to avoid upsetting others during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss> |
4. |
A* 2022-12-24 03:27:53 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
better? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>wearing a face mask (only) not to potentially upset others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a face mask (only) to not potentially upset others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss> |
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
3. |
A 2022-12-24 03:02:05 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Def. not a given that other people would actually be upset! |
|
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>wearing a face mask (only) not to upset others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a face mask (only) not to potentially upset others (during the COVID-19 pandemic)</gloss> |
2. |
A 2022-12-24 02:44:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
1. |
A* 2022-12-22 16:59:32 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
50 ish tweets past 24hrs
e.g.
https://mobile.twitter.com/yamikawadays/status/1602861937829859330
そんなにツラいなら忖度マスクするか転園すればいいのに…
https://president.jp/articles/-/60935?page=1
世界一マスクを着用しているのに、陽性者数は世界最悪…日本人はいいかげん「忖度マスク」をやめるべきだ
...
とはいえ、本気でコロナを恐れている人はいまや少数派ではなかろうか。30%いるかどうかもわからない。多くはただただ「忖度そんたくマスク」を着けているだけである。
https://president.jp/articles/-/50401?page=1
他人の目を気にする「忖度マスク」がはびこる限り、日本のコロナ騒動は絶対に終わらない...
密な状況でもない屋外であれば、マスクを着ける必要はない。しかしマスクを着けていないと非常識扱いされるため、無駄に着けている。そんな“忖度マスク”が続く限り、コロナ騒動は終わらないだろう
https://sendai-akamon.ac.jp/column/3618
また、ほとんどの人がマスクをしているのに、自分だけ外せないという「同調マスク」、
話し相手や周囲の人を安心させるための「忖度(そんたく)マスク」を続けている人も多いだろう。
(同調マスク is not common on twitter, 10 tweets past week) |
|
Comments: |
I think in actual usage, it's often synonymous with 同調マスク, hence the second gloss
Meaning is not obvious from our 忖度 entry, but it should probably be updated, I think the word has changed somewhat in meaning these past years. |