| 6. |
A 2022-10-01 22:53:09 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Dropping [sens] from ...死ぬ entries. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc> |
| 5. |
A 2019-12-04 22:11:34 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think we should keep them for now. Perhaps a note in the Editorial Policy? |
| 4. |
A* 2019-12-04 21:31:30 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
a quick check suggests the sens was dropped from 畳の上で死ぬ, but from none of the others. |
| 3. |
A* 2019-12-04 21:28:51 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
the original [sens] list comes from a batch of words that were banned on NHK (usu. for being politically incorrect)
i don't think there are that many compound verbs that take the form ~死ぬ. all of the modern japanese ones (焼け死ぬ, 溺れ死ぬ, 凍え死ぬ) were banned on nhk, and all are marked [sens]. 死ぬ itself is also marked as [sens]. presumably it was felt that these are all just too blunt to say on TV. |
| 2. |
A 2019-12-04 21:24:24 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj |
| |
Comments: |
temp approve for vi |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2019-12-04 21:06:22 Alan Cheng <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
How come this is [sens]? It doesn't seem any worse than the other 死ぬ verbs. |