| 7. |
A 2022-09-22 19:55:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 6. |
A* 2022-09-22 15:34:56 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ボケ味 │ 36,936 │ 95.7% │
│ ぼけ味 │ 1,524 │ 3.9% │
│ 暈け味 │ 112 │ 0.3% │ 🡠 rK (daijs)
│ ぼけあじ │ 28 │ 0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯ |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf> |
| 5. |
A 2022-09-22 13:06:15 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<reb>ボケあじ</reb>
-<re_restr>ボケ味</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>ぼけ味</re_restr>
-<re_restr>暈け味</re_restr>
@@ -24 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2686360">暈け・ぼけ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2686360">ぼけ</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field> |
| 4. |
A 2020-12-23 00:15:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK. I'll put it back here, and remove it from 暈け. Not really sure. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>bokeh style (of photography)</gloss>
+<gloss>bokeh</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2020-12-13 05:37:13 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I was thinking it was maybe wrong to add "bokeh" to 暈け in the first place (that was me), but I'm not really sure. I think the OL definition
of "bokeh" is very close to daijs' 暈け味, so it might be better to change 暈け rather than this. |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A* 2020-12-13 04:46:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Ref: "写真撮影時の代表的な*表現方法*のひとつ" |
| |
Comments: |
I feel it needs to be distinguished from the base 暈け/ボケ entry. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -24,2 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>bokeh</gloss>
-<gloss>out-of-focus blur</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2686360">暈け・ぼけ</xref>
+<gloss>bokeh style (of photography)</gloss>
+<gloss>out-of-focus style</gloss>
+<gloss>blur style</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2020-12-13 04:24:15 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs, eij
daijs: "... レンズ固有の風合い"
https://ptl.imagegateway.net/contents/original/glossary/ボケ味.html
ぼけ味 1524
ボケ味 36936
暈け味 112
jst: "dementia trend" ???
oxford languages defines bokeh as "the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a
particular lens." |