6. |
A 2022-08-22 02:35:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
国際 24523675 99.9%
國際 30964 0.1% |
|
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> |
5. |
A* 2022-08-21 03:18:56 Cuyler Otsuka <...address hidden...>
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>國際</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf> |
4. |
A 2018-02-23 21:47:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Not sure about "n" for sense 1. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
3. |
A* 2018-02-16 21:46:32 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
daij
daijr: "〔漢訳「万国公法」(1864年)の「各国交際」から造語され
た。当初は英語 diplomatic intercourse の訳語とした〕" |
|
Comments: |
(not to derail the discussion but I thought this should be
recorded) |
|
Diff: |
@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>diplomatic intercourse</gloss>
+</sense> |
2. |
A* 2018-02-15 23:53:42 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I'd argue it shouldn't be there at all. |
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
1. |
A* 2018-02-15 22:55:53 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Should adj-no come first? |