https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Romanized_Japanese - ~~where a Japanese term or name is commonly used in English, such as "tofu" and "judo", macrons would typically not be included on the long vowels. It may be appropriate to include the version with macrons in parentheses at the end of the gloss, e.g. "somen (sōmen)". Terms that are not regularly used in English should use macrons, e.g. "man'yōgana".''

Maybe this works.
Yes, perhaps we should go back to "riichi"; it's far more common.

@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<gloss>joseki</gloss>
-<gloss>jōseki</gloss>
+<gloss>joseki (jōseki)</gloss>

I agree we should be consistent. But if English-language sources overwhelmingly favour a particular form, I think we should use it (instead of a standard Hepburn romanization). I'd support reversing the decision to convert all instances of "riichi" to "rīchi". The later is barely used.

Let's have both.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>jōseki</gloss>

The corresponding wiki encyclopedia article uses jōseki throughout.

I don't really mind either way, but we also use "rīchi" despite "riichi" being the standard spelling among English-speaking mahjong players. Just trying to be consistent.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/joseki

Usually "joseki" in English.

@@ -24,3 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>jōseki</gloss>
-<gloss>standard sequence (esp. in a corner)</gloss>
-<gloss>standard move</gloss>
+<gloss>joseki</gloss>
+<gloss>standard sequence of moves (esp. in a corner)</gloss>