| 4. |
A 2022-06-30 00:13:16 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc> |
| 3. |
A 2013-01-25 02:56:15 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
You're right of course, it's most likely read みんしょ. My
mistake. |
| 2. |
A* 2013-01-24 08:52:29 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
without evidence to the contrary, i suspect the reading for sense 2 is wrong. Ming dynasty is 明[みん], not 明[めい] |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 明治初年</s_inf>
@@ -15,5 +17,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>early Ming dynasty</gloss>
-</sense> |
| 1. |
A* 2013-01-24 08:31:09 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Refs: |
nikk: 明治初年を略して用いた語。
past tense so I'm assuming it's arch.
sense 2:
daijs 鄭和 entry: "明初、宦官として燕王（永楽帝）に仕え ... " |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>early Ming dynasty</gloss>
+</sense> |