6. |
A 2022-06-25 01:21:07 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I had in mind that it is a good candidate for [rare] once that migration happens. |
5. |
A* 2022-06-24 23:33:10 Marcus Richert
|
|
Comments: |
i don't think it's obsc within the context it's actually used,i.e. in paper making. |
4. |
A 2022-06-24 20:17:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
OK |
|
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc> |
3. |
A* 2022-06-24 12:15:32 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
We don't have any paper meaning on record for 抄, and we don't have an n-pref sense for 試 either. (we probably shouldn't - it's kanwa)
So it won't be at all obvious to anybody coming across it (like me). I think it's worth having, even if it is obviously obscure outside of the paper industry. |
2. |
A* 2022-06-24 06:29:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
0 n-grams, low Googits, nothing from Reverso. |
|
Comments: |
Does this really make the grade? |
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
1. |
A* 2022-06-24 05:09:25 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
jst
saw in book from 1970 |
|
Comments: |
gloss can be improved |