| 4. |
A 2022-04-29 02:29:30 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK |
| 3. |
A* 2022-04-28 10:07:15 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
It isn't necessarily an interjection. I think we should keep it simple. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>∫</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2218020">非ず・あらず・1</xref>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2218020">あらず・1</xref>
@@ -15,3 +15 @@
-<gloss>is not</gloss>
-<gloss>am not</gloss>
-<gloss>are not</gloss>
+<gloss>not</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2022-04-25 11:58:51 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>∫</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2218020">非ず・あらず・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2218020">非ず・あらず</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2022-04-21 04:49:19 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1263047577
This post cites a classical Japanese dictionary by Iwanami
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
26,545 68.1% あらざる
8,379 21.5% 非ざる
2,431 6.2% 在らざる
1,648 4.2% 有らざる |
| |
Comments: |
Glosses copied from seq 2823770 (ではない)
I think this is just a different form of 非ず? (seq 2218020)
Including the [exp] tag because it has one.
This might need one of those archaic POS tags like v2r-k or
v2r-s, but I can't find an authoritative source. |