| 7. |
A 2022-03-10 04:40:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think シッピング is "adjective-like", but I can live with this. |
| 6. |
A* 2022-03-09 23:56:42 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Assuming you meant "considered an adjective", no, it's always a noun. But the description of adj-f is "noun or verb acting prenominally"; it doesn't have to be an adjective. That being said, we do usually reserve adj-f for adjective-like terms, which シッピング is not. I suggest this instead. We have the same note on a few other entries. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. in compounds</s_inf> |
| 5. |
A* 2022-03-08 10:42:41 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
(I saw it as オンラインシッピングツール on japanpost.co.jp. Several of the first hits on Google are about ドロップシッピング)
シッピングニュース is the name of a movie and and I don't think "shipping" is an adjective here, nor in シッピングアドバイス.
The fact that another noun follows it doesn't automatically mean it's an adjective and I don't think it makes sense to describe it as such. Can "shipping" at all be considered a noun in English? |
| 4. |
A 2022-03-08 10:12:57 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
シッピング 6605
シッピング・ニュース 2137
シッピングアドバイス 1266
シッピングニュース 1084
シッピングニュースの 1069
シッピング・アドバイス 723 |
| |
Comments: |
That's how it's almost always used. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos> |
| 3. |
A* 2022-03-08 03:17:24 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't see the point of making this adj-f. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos> |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A 2012-06-29 21:10:55 Paul Upchurch <...address hidden...>
|
| 1. |
A* 2012-06-27 11:12:48 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijr, Eijiro |