JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1587750 Active (id: 2180970)
入り混じる入り交じる [news2,nf26] 入りまじる
いりまじる [news2,nf26]
1. [v5r,vi]
《esp. 入り交じる for people》
▶ to mix (with)
▶ to be mixed (together)
▶ to be mingled

Conjugations


History:
7. A 2022-03-08 11:00:03  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6. A* 2022-03-07 23:04:53  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
gg5, prog
  Diff:
@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to mix with</gloss>
-<gloss>to be mixed</gloss>
+<gloss>to mix (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be mixed (together)</gloss>
5. A 2020-03-26 11:13:37  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
No reactions. Closing.
4. A* 2020-03-05 05:16:24  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
Daijr, GG5, etc.
入り混じる	32327
入り交じる	14943
入交じる	32
入り雑じる	55
入りまじる	985
入混じる	31
  Comments:
I have proposed splitting the senses of the 混じる/交じる entry along people/objects lines, as indicated in GG5. For this one Daijirin, GG5, etc. only have 入り交じる, and Kojien only has 入り雑じる. The explanations are rather mixed too:
Daijirin: 多くの物がまじり合う。 
KoJ: さまざまのものがまざり合う。
GG5 & 中辞典: people, countries, flowers, hopes, feeling
I wondered about doing a split here, but I think the case is not strong. Maybe a note?
I propose dropping the less common forms.
  Diff:
@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>入交じる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>入り雑じる</keb>
@@ -28,0 +23 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 入り交じる for people</s_inf>
3. A* 2020-03-04 08:26:20  Hendrik
  Refs:
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20200303/k10012311511000.html
  Comments:
The referenced news item and a related conversation with a native speaker has brought up a lingering concern on my part: could it be that 入り交じる and 入り混じる might perhaps not be as interchangeable as one might infer from the dictionary entry?
We suspect that the former applies to human beings doing the "mingling/mixing" or being/getting "mingled/mixed" (applicable to both the active voice and the passive voice), while the latter applies to things as well as concepts (notions/ideas/memes) doing the "mingling/mixing" (or being/getting "mingled/mixed"). Is there any evidence to support such a differentiation?
(show/hide 2 older log entries)

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml