| 10. |
A 2022-01-15 07:41:35 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
mk |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos> |
| 9. |
A 2018-05-19 15:19:30 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr/s |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf> |
| 8. |
A 2018-05-19 09:40:09 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>reading (a text) aloud without without trying to understand it</gloss>
+<gloss>reading (a text) aloud without trying to understand it</gloss> |
| 7. |
A 2018-05-19 07:22:33 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 6. |
A* 2018-05-11 14:31:25 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daij, prog |
| |
Comments: |
Splitting into senses.
The refs say "声を出して読む" for sense 1. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -21,2 +21,6 @@
-<gloss>reading without comprehending</gloss>
-<gloss>reading a second draft without checking it against the original (draught)</gloss>
+<gloss>reading (a text) aloud without without trying to understand it</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>reading a second draft without checking it against the original</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 5 older log entries)
|
| 5. |
A 2010-12-21 08:38:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think that's a good guideline. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -20,2 +20,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく</xref> |
| 4. |
A* 2010-12-21 08:08:31 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
well, i'm still all for merging in many cases, even if it means a number of
restrictions. the point here is primarily that important information about
'correct' orthography, etc. is lost. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく</xref>
-<xref type="see">素読・そどく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく・1</xref> |
| 3. |
A* 2010-12-21 05:36:36 Scott
|
| |
Comments: |
"should we make a guideline that entries should ~never~ be merged if the only thing holding them together is [io], [ik], or [iK]?"
I think that's a very good idea. I've argued against excessive merging before and that's probably just the right guideline. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -23,1 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see">素読・そどく</xref> |
| 2. |
A* 2010-12-21 04:27:55 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
what's the ruling here? we've got 素読み[そよみ] and 素読[そよみ]. to me it
would make more sense to remove そよみ from 素読 and include it here as [io].
-
but then we still have two entries with the same headword and meaning, so
we're supposed to merge under the "2/3 rule". should we make a guideline
that entries should ~never~ be merged if the only thing holding them
together is [io], [ik], or [iK]? then we could keep すよみ/そよみ and そどく
separate. (that would mean that are a number of already-merged entries that
need to be cleaned up as we come across them though) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>素読</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> |
| 1. |
A* 2010-12-20 22:33:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijirin |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そよみ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1749590">素読・そどく</xref> |