| 5. |
A 2022-01-09 05:34:42 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
mk
侵食 252875
侵蝕 16475
侵食して 27699
侵蝕して 1564 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos> |
| 4. |
A 2020-01-02 16:41:15 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, gg5 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<field>&geol;</field> |
| 3. |
A 2014-03-29 21:58:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Just adding that I agree with Rene. They are different, although there seems to be some use of 侵食 when perhaps 浸食 should be used. |
| 2. |
A 2014-03-29 18:19:25 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
no source merges, but there is meaning overlap on that sense. i think this is a better solution |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1595160">浸食</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2014-03-29 09:40:47
|
| |
Comments: |
should these two be merged?
浸食(P); 浸蝕 【しんしょく】 (n,vs) erosion; corrosion; (P)
侵食(P); 侵蝕 【しんしょく】 (n,vs) encroachment; erosion; corrosion; (P)
sanseido says 'encroachment' is unique to 侵食 though |