| 6. |
A 2021-12-14 03:08:48 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&gramm;</field> |
| 5. |
A 2020-03-10 06:43:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think the 加 version can go - people will find it in the 加行 abbreviation if they are curious. It gets a minute number of Googits - all in academic papers.
Yes, "declension" is wrong. I tend to use "inflection" these days as it's more general, but "conjugation" is fine for verbs of course. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>加行変格活用</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +12 @@
-<gloss>irregular inflection of the verb "kuru"</gloss>
+<gloss>irregular conjugation of the verb "kuru"</gloss> |
| 4. |
A* 2020-03-07 21:36:23 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
- I think either works, but isn't it enough to have these forms on the か行/ら行/わ行 entries? I don't think we need them here.
- I'd go with "conjugation" given that it specifically refers to verbs. Declension is simply wrong (verbs don't decline). |
| 3. |
A* 2020-03-06 22:05:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Two matters I'd like to raise with this type of entry:
- are with comfortable with the "ateji" tag on the 加行... form? I don't mind, but maybe "oK" might be better.
- I think it's cleaner just to say "inflection" rather than "conjugation (inflection, declension)". Less cluttered and just as accurate. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>irregular conjugation (inflection, declension) of the verb "kuru"</gloss>
+<gloss>irregular inflection of the verb "kuru"</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2020-03-06 12:25:56 dine <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www.google.com/search?q="加行変格活用" |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>加行変格活用</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A 2007-03-28 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |