| 4. |
A 2021-12-12 23:25:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK. I went with the JEs but it felt odd. |
| 3. |
A* 2021-12-12 23:14:52 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www.nihongo-appliedlinguistics.net/wp/archives/8585
"言語学で有標（marked）・無標（unmarked）という概念をよく使います。この有標・無標の概念のことを有標性（markedness）ということもあります。"
http://user.keio.ac.jp/~rhotta/hellog/2019-07-07-1.html
"ある音韻が有標 (marked) か無標 (unmarked) かを決定する要因の問題，すなわち有標性 (markedness) を巡る指標の問題については，音韻論でも様々な議論がなされてきた．" |
| |
Comments: |
I think adjective glosses are better here. "markedness" is 有標性. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2852358">無標</xref>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>markedness</gloss>
+<gloss>marked</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2021-12-11 06:26:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, ルミナス
有標 1869
有標な 47
有標の 544
有標性 430 |
| |
Comments: |
GG5 glosses in as a noun. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>marked</gloss>
+<gloss>markedness</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2021-12-11 03:01:50 dine
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr
有標 1869
有標の 544 |