JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1463910 Deleted (id: 2166935)
日間日合い
ひあい
1. [n] [arch]
▶ number of days
▶ period of days
Cross references:
  ⇒ see: 1582700 日数【にっすう】 1. number of days
2. [n] [arch]
▶ daily interest rate



History:
10. D 2021-11-30 08:14:09  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
OK
9. A* 2021-11-11 00:25:35  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
The problem with 日間/かかん/にちかん is that, unlike 週間 and 年間, it's not really a word. 2日間 is 2日+間, not 2+日間. 
I don't think there's an issue with deleting these archaic entries. No one will miss them.
8. A* 2021-11-07 04:55:31  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
Koj, Daijr/s
  Comments:
I quite understand the confusion when one encounters 日間 in text, but I'm reluctant to toss out entries which are there in the kokugos.
I think a better approach is to revive the deleted 日間/かかん/にちかん. Then people encountering 2日間 or whatever will get the full story.
  Diff:
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
7. A* 2021-11-05 18:14:34  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
https://furigana.info/w/日間
  Comments:
In contemporary Japanese, 日間 is always preceded by a number and read かかん/にちかん, meaning "~ days".
This entry and 2827650 (日間/にっかん) are both archaic. I think they should be deleted so as not to cause confusion. None of the occurrences of 日間 that have furigana in Aozora Bunko is read ひあい or にっかん. And 日合い gets zero hits.
The edit history says I've removed an x-ref but I haven't; it's just that the entry was deleted.
  Diff:
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2827721">日間・かかん</xref>
6. A 2015-10-24 04:15:28  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 5 older log entries)

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml