JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1629420 Active (id: 2156359)
錻力 [ateji,rK] 鉄葉 [ateji,rK] [ateji,rK]
ブリキ [gai1]
1. [n] [uk] Source lang: dut "blik"
▶ tin plate
Cross references:
  ⇐ see: 2839936 ブリキ缶【ブリキかん】 1. tin can



History:
5. A 2021-11-06 07:55:04  Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
錻力	910
ブリキ	438716
  Diff:
@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
4. A 2010-08-30 11:35:53  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
I think it will work OK.
  Diff:
@@ -17,3 +17,0 @@
-<reb>ぶりき</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -21,1 +18,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
3. A* 2010-08-27 06:23:21  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
so what to do in this case then?  because this is also written in hiragana...  throw out the nokanji?  and if the [gai1] is on ブリキ, would it then be listed first as a reading?
2. A* 2010-08-26 06:38:04  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
Actually I think it's OK in those circumstances to drop the hiragana and no_kanji. That's done in some other cases such as 1396500/センチ. The original idea of the no-kanji was to enable a katakana-only version to go out in the (old) EDICT format, but I think that's less of an issue.
1. A* 2010-08-25 19:12:32  Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
another case where the nokanji is questionable. if they're ateji for a foreign word and the foreign word is written in katakana, it seems that the nokanji shouldn't be there
  Diff:
@@ -26,0 +26,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml