5. |
A 2021-10-26 04:12:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
OK. JUst a thought. It should be clear from the 年代. |
4. |
A* 2021-10-26 00:22:49 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I think keeping them simple and not including
the century in the gloss is better -
effectively it future-proofs them. |
3. |
A* 2021-10-26 00:09:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Before ticking these off, two questions:
- should we be a little wider in the explanation, e.g. for "the '30s" should it have "the '30s (1930s)" or "the '30s; the 1930s"?
- for the '10s and the '20s I wonder if it can mean more than one century. Depending on the context, '10s could mean the 1910s or the 2010s. |
2. |
A* 2021-10-25 14:03:18
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>120年代</keb>
+<keb>20年代</keb> |
1. |
A* 2021-10-25 14:03:01 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
see 70年代 entry |