| 6. |
A 2021-10-22 04:11:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I guess so. |
| 5. |
A* 2021-10-18 22:42:48 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20211019/k100
13312721000.html
最高裁判所裁判官の国民審査 きょう告示 今回の対象は11人
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/06/11/n
ational/tokyo-district-court-holds-first-
hearing-expats-right-vote-supreme-court-
justices/
Tokyo District Court holds first hearing on
expats' right to vote on Supreme Court
justices
Five Japanese living abroad claimed at the
Tokyo District Court on Monday that their
inability to participate in national reviews
of Supreme Court justices was
unconstitutional.
koj
国民が直接に法律の制定や公務員の任命などを審査する制度。
日本では最高裁判所の裁判官に対して行われ、有効投票の過半
数により罷免を可とされた裁判官が罷免される。衆議院議員の
総選挙の際に同時に行われる。
daijr
．．． 日本では最高裁判所の裁判官に対して...
daijs just has it as 最高裁判所裁判官の適・不適を国
民が審査すること。 (i.e. no mention of other
legal matters)
nikk also: 最高裁判所の裁判官が適任であるかどうかを、
国民が投票によって審査すること。 |
| |
Comments: |
The word "national review" doesn't appear to
be used for this kind of referendum outside
Japan so I think it's ok to just describe what
this means in the context of Japan, as nikk
and daijs do. (by not mentioning "other legal
matters")
It's a little wordy but I don't think it's
"encyclopedic", it's still denser and has less
info than any of the kokugo entries. It can
maybe be shortened a little but I think we
shouldn't trim out any of this information |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>national review (referendum on a legal matter)</gloss>
+<gloss>national review</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">national referendum on the appointment or re-appointment of Supreme Court judges, held at the same time as general elections to the House of Representatives</gloss> |
| 4. |
A 2019-07-09 10:54:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Trimming. I don't think it needs to be encyclopaedic. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>national review (national referendum on a legal matter initiated by the Supreme Court)</gloss>
+<gloss>national review (referendum on a legal matter)</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2019-07-09 10:35:44
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>national review (e.g. of supreme court judges)</gloss>
+<gloss>national review (national referendum on a legal matter initiated by the Supreme Court)</gloss> |
| 2. |
A* 2019-07-09 04:26:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Maybe this is better? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>national review (as an act of a peoples' sovereignty)</gloss>
+<gloss>national review (e.g. of supreme court judges)</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2019-07-08 09:23:21 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24751839.2017.1380272
国民審査 people’s examination national referendum
chujiten: "popular review 《of the Supreme Court justices》"
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?re=01&vm=04&id=303
"最高裁判所裁判官国民審査法
Act on National Review for Judges of Supreme Court"
brit's definition: 国民が直接投票することによって，法律や公務員などの適否を審査する制度 |
| |
Comments: |
I think "national review" is the most correct and official translation, but I don't really understand what our clarification is supposed to
convey. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&law;</field> |