| 11. |
A 2021-10-20 05:43:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 10. |
A* 2021-10-20 01:10:49 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri> |
| 9. |
A* 2021-10-20 01:09:42 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think just "without" is a good gloss |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>without</gloss>
+<gloss>without doing</gloss> |
| 8. |
A 2021-01-13 01:32:15 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think it's probably better to have it than not. The note, etc. should help. It's not
really irregular, any more than other する inflections are. |
| 7. |
A* 2021-01-12 21:04:35 Timofei Shatrov <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
The difference is that 来ず[こず] comes from 来ない[こない] regularly, while しない to せず is irregular and it's not obvious what it's a conjugation of. |
|
(show/hide 6 older log entries)
|
| 6. |
A* 2021-01-11 04:34:46 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
We usually tag conjugations as exp, I believe.
If it doesn't appear in the conjugation table, I think that's really an issue with the conjugation table.
A jisho search for せず for example brings up
"せず could be an inflection of する, with these forms:
Zu-form. It means “Without doing Verb.”"
(unfortunately, they also have this entry appearing, even though it was deleted 8 months ago... I thought Kim had fixed this issue)
If we include this, we should also have 来ず. But I'm not convinced we need either. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos> |
| 5. |
A* 2021-01-10 00:27:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://www.edrdg.org/cgi-bin/wwwjdic/wwwjdic?1W�٤�_vs-i |
| |
Comments: |
It's not really a word in its own right, so to speak, but an inflection of する. See row 1
of the linked table. We have せずに as an entry as this is common adverb.
Maybe it could be revived. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,2 +8,4 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1006540">せずに</xref>
+<misc>&litf;</misc>
+<s_inf>neg. continuative form of する</s_inf> |
| 4. |
D* 2021-01-09 21:23:03 Timofei Shatrov <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Why is this (extremely common) word deleted?
It's not listed as any valid conjugation of する here: http://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/conj.py?e=2000606&svc=jmdict&sid=&
so how I'm supposed to parse something like 存在せず if it can't be derived from conjugation rules? |
| 3. |
D 2020-04-19 22:16:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
D* 2020-04-19 15:14:23 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Indeed. Just the ず form of する. It's definitely not a particle. I think it can go. |
| 1. |
A* 2020-04-19 01:24:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
? |
| |
Comments: |
I feel this is not correct, and not needed. It's "just" an inflection. |