| 8. |
A 2021-10-18 21:02:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
If だ can be tagged "cop" then this can. I'm not a fan of regarding either
as a copula; it's not Latin. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&cop;</pos>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>polite copula</s_inf> |
| 7. |
A* 2021-10-17 23:46:02 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Can't we use "cop" for the PoS here? I don't think the fact that it's a polite form makes it any less of a copula.
I don't think the であります x-ref is needed. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref> |
| 6. |
A 2016-10-22 11:02:27 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
restoring lost xref |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref> |
| 5. |
A 2016-10-22 10:58:18 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 4. |
A* 2016-10-22 10:54:43 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
we usually treat polite forms of verbs as [exp] |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008340">である</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2255600">であります</xref> |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
| 3. |
A 2012-04-07 23:56:33 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Accepting, but see comments on だ. |
| 2. |
A* 2012-04-07 22:46:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, ルミナス |
| |
Comments: |
See comments on だ (2089020) |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1008340">である</xref>
@@ -15,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to be</gloss>
+<gloss>be</gloss>
+<gloss>is</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2012-04-07 21:05:33 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
providing an actual translation, synching with recommended amendment to だ |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>polite copula in Japanese</gloss>
+<s_inf>polite copula</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be</gloss> |