| 11. |
A 2021-10-07 01:10:32 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mustelidae</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">family comprising the weasels</gloss>
+<gloss>Mustelidae (family comprising the weasels)</gloss> |
| 10. |
A 2012-09-13 10:59:20 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 9. |
A* 2012-09-13 09:56:54 Marcus
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Mustelidae (weasel family)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mustelidae</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">family comprising the weasels</gloss> |
| 8. |
A 2012-03-26 20:55:16 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, I agree that "mustelids" should not be a gloss. (It refers to the animals themselves as opposed to the family.) |
| 7. |
A* 2012-03-26 00:42:53 Marcus
|
| |
Comments: |
It's my understanding that X-ids refer to X類 rather than X
科, i.e. members of the 科, rather than the 科 itself. I
thought I saw a 科 entry where Rene had removed the "X-id"
gloss giving an explanation like that but I couldn't find it
looking through entries ending in 科 now, so it might have
been a different kind of entry. But if "mustelids" is
accepted here, shouldn't ideally each 科 entry have an -"id"
gloss as well? |
|
(show/hide 6 older log entries)
|
| 6. |
A* 2012-03-25 22:54:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Why? Mustelids is just the English for Mustelidae (Latin). Harmless. Useful for English lookups. |
| 5. |
A* 2012-03-24 12:51:14
|
| |
Comments: |
イタチ類 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>Mustelids</gloss> |
| 4. |
A 2012-03-21 21:58:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 3. |
A* 2012-03-21 02:52:58 Marcus
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Mustelidae</gloss>
+<gloss>Mustelidae (weasel family)</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2010-08-17 22:15:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Reading. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>いたちか</reb>
+<reb>イタチか</reb> |
| 1. |
A 2009-11-14 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |