JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
1. |
[n]
▶ capable person ▶ talented person
|
|||||
2. |
[n]
▶ human resources ▶ personnel |
8. | A 2021-09-29 08:33:38 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | Don't see what adj-no brings to the table here. Seems like the use would have to be possessive. you wouldn't call a talented person "人材の人" |
|
Diff: | @@ -22 +21,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -28 +26,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
|
7. | A 2014-10-28 05:23:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | OK. I think this is cleanest. Re Marcus': "I don't think it was a good idea to add "人財" to all compound nouns beginning with "人材" - I think they appear often enough and with the same meanings to warrent inclusion, with a tag that they're not the right kanji. |
|
6. | A* 2014-10-27 17:09:38 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | -i've given it its own entry. AFAICT, no dictionary gives mixes the readings for those kanji -i suspect that 人財 may be a little different, but without evidence, i'm happy with the iK |
|
Diff: | @@ -14,3 +13,0 @@ -<k_ele> -<keb>人才</keb> -</k_ele> @@ -22,3 +18,0 @@ -</r_ele> -<r_ele> -<reb>じんさい</reb> |
|
5. | A* 2014-10-27 02:14:35 Marcus Richert | |
Comments: | I don't think 人才 should be marked as such - it is in both daijs and daijr. _ I feel that 人財 could perhaps be its own entry because it doesn't seem 100% synonymous with 人材 because of the very positive connotations of the second character. I don't think it was a good idea to add "人財" to all compound nouns beginning with "人材" |
|
Diff: | @@ -16 +15,0 @@ -<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf> |
|
4. | A* 2014-10-24 21:33:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | Daijr (says 人財 is ateji and slang), n-grams (have 人財 at about 2% of 人材) |
|
Comments: | I'm suggesting tagging them both as wrong. |
|
Diff: | @@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf> @@ -14,0 +16 @@ +<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf> |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries) |