| 4. |
A 2021-06-27 23:36:18 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
"漢字" x-ref was dropped from 和字 entry so dropping the x-ref here as well. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1666610">和字・1</xref>
@@ -20 +19 @@
-<gloss>Chinese characters</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese character</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2020-01-28 17:38:34 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
Singular form is fine. |
| 2. |
A 2020-01-28 06:44:42 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Agree. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1666610">和字</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1666610">和字・1</xref> |
| 1. |
A* 2020-01-28 02:11:06 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
all of my english dictionaries contain 'kanji'; it should be the first gloss (esp. since "kanji" it also includes Japanese-origin characters), whereas "Chinese characters" seemingly doesn't |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1666610">和字</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1666610">和字</xref>
+<gloss>kanji</gloss>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>kanji</gloss> |