| 18. |
A 2021-05-24 01:38:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think it was an attempt to avoid having just an explanation as a gloss. |
| 17. |
A* 2021-05-23 23:32:30 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think we should try to force glosses for sense 1. Makes it look like か is only used for asking for confirmation. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,5 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>used at sentence-end; indicates a question (sometimes rhetorical)</s_inf>
-<gloss>yes?</gloss>
-<gloss>no?</gloss>
-<gloss>isn't it?</gloss>
-<gloss>is it?</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates a question</gloss> |
| 16. |
A 2019-12-11 20:25:57 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008530">とか・1</xref> |
| 15. |
A 2018-04-17 10:32:59 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Moving to Marcus' alternative. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +11,4 @@
-<gloss>?</gloss>
+<gloss>yes?</gloss>
+<gloss>no?</gloss>
+<gloss>isn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>is it?</gloss> |
| 14. |
A* 2018-04-08 23:32:38 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i don't really care for translating a word as a question mark. |
|
(show/hide 13 older log entries)
|
| 13. |
A* 2018-04-05 12:21:31 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
sense 6 see
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-
grammar/about-adjectives-and-adverbs/adjectives-forms |
| |
Comments: |
removing "was written as 歟" from note as it was getting a
little crowded in there
_
sense 1 could be "yes?; no?; isn't it?; is it?" if that's
what other editors prefer, I suppose. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>was written as 歟; used at sentence-end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates a question (sometimes rhetorical)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used at sentence-end; indicates a question (sometimes rhetorical)</s_inf>
+<gloss>?</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes after other particles</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates doubt, uncertainty, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates doubt, uncertainty, etc.; sometimes after other particles</s_inf>
+<gloss>hmm</gloss>
+<gloss>huh</gloss>
@@ -34,2 +35,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. before an adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>emphatic prefix</gloss>
+<s_inf>emphatic prefix; usu. before an adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
@@ -40,2 +41,7 @@
-<s_inf>after an indeclinable word</s_inf>
-<gloss>suffix forming adjectives or adverbs</gloss>
+<s_inf>suffix forming adjectives or adverbs; after an indeclinable word</s_inf>
+<gloss>-al</gloss>
+<gloss>-ial</gloss>
+<gloss>-ic</gloss>
+<gloss>-ical</gloss>
+<gloss>-ish</gloss>
+<gloss>-y</gloss> |
| 12. |
A 2017-07-17 10:00:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijr (かっ entry) |
| |
Comments: |
I think this should be a separate entry. I'll propose one, and close this. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -48,4 +47,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<gloss>emphatic particle (often as かッ)</gloss>
-</sense> |
| 11. |
A* 2017-07-08 11:49:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Is that really a particle? It looks like an interjection. Probably should be in a different entry, if included at all. |
| 10. |
A* 2017-07-08 10:41:53 Davide Della Via
|
| |
Refs: |
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DC0ofblVwAAph8v.jpg:large |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -47,0 +48,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<gloss>emphatic particle (often as かッ)</gloss>
+</sense> |
| 9. |
A 2014-04-01 11:52:57 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 8. |
A* 2014-04-01 11:18:17 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>between alternatives</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after each alternative</s_inf> |
| 7. |
A* 2014-04-01 02:36:42 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Comments: |
is "《between alternatives》" strictly correct? wouldn't the
"more correct" form be "AかBか", with "ＡかB" being seen as a
shortened/casual version? |
| 6. |
A 2014-04-01 00:51:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Thanks for all the work on this. I've moved the Tatoeba key example along from sense 2 to sense 4. I need to trawl the 1000+ sentences for examples of the other senses. Most are for sense 1, or course. |
| 5. |
A* 2014-03-31 22:38:59 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
naoko chino for prt senses
koj, daij, etc. for others |
| |
Comments: |
if the 'emphatic prefix' gloss gets an expl, then most of the rest of the standalone explanatory glosses here should have it too |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>was written with 歟</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates question (sentence end)</gloss>
+<s_inf>was written as 歟; used at sentence-end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates a question (sometimes rhetorical)</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,15 @@
-<gloss>indicates choice, doubt, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>between alternatives</s_inf>
+<gloss>or</gloss>
+<gloss>whether or not</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1188270">何か</xref>
+<s_inf>after an interrogative</s_inf>
+<gloss>some- (e.g. something, someone)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008530">とか</xref>
+<s_inf>sometimes after other particles</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates doubt, uncertainty, etc.</gloss>
@@ -19 +33,14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">emphatic prefix</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1003060">か弱い</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. before an adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>emphatic prefix</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1435360">定か</xref>
+<s_inf>after an indeclinable word</s_inf>
+<gloss>suffix forming adjectives or adverbs</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>in that way</gloss> |
| 4. |
A* 2014-03-31 12:38:27 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr
「 －弱い」 「 －細い」 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<gloss g_type="expl">emphatic prefix</gloss>
+</sense> |
| 3. |
A* 2014-03-31 12:25:12 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think "or" would be a good gloss for (part of) the second
sense |
| 2. |
A* 2014-03-31 12:00:35 Francis
|
| |
Refs: |
See below. |
| |
Comments: |
Would you be willing to give an example for [2] above in order to show usage. For example, one could include [eg, "彼か彼女か" meaning "him or her" or "これかそれか" meaning "this or that"] or something similar.
In [1] above, it is quite clear for the novice searcher because you explain "indicates question (sentence end)" which is definitive in intended usage, but "か", which crops up elsewhere in a sentence with various usage, is not quite so easy.
You do have a separate entry, e.g., "かどうか (exp) whether or not (in phrases like "I don't know whether or not I can come"); (P)", which helps. Maybe, a little explanation of usage in the above [2] meaning with perhaps a cross-link with ""かどうか" would serve the purpose. |
| 1. |
A 2005-03-05 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |