| 5. |
A 2020-11-06 21:58:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
In 金将/金將 sorts of situations I think an "oK" is fine. It signals to users that they shouldn't be using the 金將 as though it were a regular and recognized form.
As to whether 將 should be here at all, I think the point is that it shows up in some shogi contexts. Apart from that, it obviously needs caution. For example, you'll find 將校 in pre-WWII documents, which is why it's in the 将校 entry. |
| 4. |
A* 2020-11-06 21:43:02 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
金将 8975
金將 No matches
not mentioned in nikk etc. |
| |
Comments: |
Do we need to add an oK that only contains a 旧
字体 of one of the original kanji? We could add
this to any word that includes the kanji 将. |
| 3. |
A 2020-11-06 05:32:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
A* 2020-11-05 22:56:34 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Refs: |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金將</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf> |
| 1. |
A 2014-12-20 23:02:58 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>gold general (shogi)</gloss>
+<field>&shogi;</field>
+<gloss>gold general</gloss> |