| 12. |
A 2020-05-03 07:43:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 11. |
A* 2020-05-03 05:12:05 Opencooper
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>user who uses a online handle (instead of posting anonymously)</gloss>
+<gloss>user who uses an online handle (instead of posting anonymously)</gloss> |
| 10. |
A 2018-06-02 01:47:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 9. |
A* 2018-05-24 05:20:14 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'm fine excluding it from this entry, but I think it should stay on the abbr. (コテ、コテハン、and probably 固定) as they are slang
expressions. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>user name (on an online forum like 2ch where the majority of users post anonymously)</gloss>
+<gloss>online handle (esp. on an online forum like 2ch where the majority of users post anonymously)</gloss>
+<gloss>screen name</gloss>
+<gloss>user name</gloss>
@@ -18 +20 @@
-<gloss>user with a user name (as opposed to posting anonymously)</gloss>
+<gloss>user who uses a online handle (instead of posting anonymously)</gloss> |
| 8. |
A* 2018-05-24 04:15:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Reopening. |
|
(show/hide 7 older log entries)
|
| 7. |
A 2018-05-24 04:15:19 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Approving temporarily to get an xref working. |
| 6. |
A* 2018-05-23 23:53:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/namefag |
| |
Comments: |
I don't think the 2ch/4chan crossover is really strong enough to have namefagm as a gloss here. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>user with a user name</gloss>
-<gloss>namefag</gloss>
+<gloss>user with a user name (as opposed to posting anonymously)</gloss> |
| 5. |
A* 2018-05-23 19:58:51 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I just don't think it's a good translation. "Namefag" is vulgar 4chan slang that the vast majority of internet users have never even heard of. 固定ハンドル is neither slang nor vulgar.
Also, I'd put the chances of someone wanting to looking up "namefag" (never mind actually trying it) in a J->E dictionary at close to zero, so I disagree that it would be "helpful for reverse lookups".
---
Ok, two senses is fine. |
| 4. |
A* 2018-05-23 17:15:06 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I agree "namefag" is a little problematic. To me, I guess it depends on to what extent this word is used outside of 2ch. If it's
used exclusively or nearly exclusively 2ch and similar sites, I think it's fine, as those sites tend to share the rough jargon of
the English-language 4chan anyway (which I think is where the word "namefag" comes from). Either way though, it's definitely
helpful for reverse lookups.
_
What's the argument for not having 2 senses, here? I think it's cleaner to split "user name" and "user" apart. And obviously they
are two different things. |
| 3. |
A* 2018-05-23 15:04:55 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'm not sure this needs to be separate sense. Also, I think the pejorative gloss is unnecessary/inappropriate. It's far too slangy. |
| 2. |
A* 2018-05-23 07:54:52 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
2 senses based on daijs: "また、それを使うユーザー。"
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/namefag
This is called "namefag" in English, but the Japanese isn't a pejorative like "namefag" "sometimes" is, according to wiktionary.
Including it nonetheless because it's potentially |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2227040">コテハン</xref>
@@ -14,2 +13,7 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>fixed handle (user name)</gloss>
+<gloss>user name (on an online forum like 2ch where the majority of users post anonymously)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>user with a user name</gloss>
+<gloss>namefag</gloss> |
| 1. |
A 2007-10-06 00:00:00
|
| |
Comments: |
Entry created |