| 4. |
A 2020-04-05 01:09:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, etc. |
| |
Comments: |
I think the approach in the JEs is enough.
"stick" without qualification is not a good gloss as it's too broad. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>stick</gloss>
-<gloss>walking stick</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1356620">杖・つえ</xref>
+<gloss>(walking) stick</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2020-04-04 16:53:04 Alan Cheng <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://dic.pixiv.net/a/魔法のステッキ |
| |
Comments: |
We have "wand" as a gloss for 杖 so it's worth having here too.
Also, the kokugos specifically mention 「西洋風」の杖 in their definitions. Should we add that here too? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>wand</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2018-01-22 21:41:15 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 1. |
A* 2018-01-22 05:56:20 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, daij, gg5 |
| |
Comments: |
i don't see evidence of wand or wizard's staff, but staff would be the same sense anyway |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11,6 +11,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&m-sl;</misc>
-<gloss>(magic) wand</gloss>
-<gloss>staff</gloss>
+<gloss>walking stick</gloss>
+<gloss>cane</gloss> |