| 6. |
A 2020-04-04 23:53:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
The others are all "repetition" marks. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">kanji iteration mark</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">kanji repetition mark</gloss> |
| 5. |
A* 2020-04-04 17:22:46 Rob Harwood <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
1000020 (ゝ) Discussion resolution. |
| |
Comments: |
Changed from [n] to [unc] to match with discussion resolution in 1000020 (ゝ). Since I was trying to add this to my IME (Windows 10, Japanese language pack), I checked Jisho (using JMDICT data) to see what part of speech to use; but 'noun' just didn't seem right. Checking 1000020 (ゝ) gave [unc] which seemed at least more reasonable, if incomplete.
Maybe there is some classification for 'special symbol' that I don't know about? Is 字点 a 'part of speech'? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&unc;</pos> |
| 4. |
A 2018-01-31 04:56:24 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i'm fine with that. however, the same argument also applies here that applied to ・ i'm pretty sure のま isn't actually a ~reading~ of this (i think this is an error by daijs). |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous kanji</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">kanji iteration mark</gloss> |
| 3. |
A* 2018-01-31 01:53:13 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Quite happy to lose all those other dubious readings, but why not just gloss it as "kanji iteration mark"? |
| 2. |
A* 2018-01-30 12:06:10 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Technically speaking, I don't think this has a reading. どうのじてん (同の字点) and のま are both names. The other "readings" are just ways of calling up the symbol in an IME.
We had a discussion about these types of symbols a few months back (entry 1000020) and agreed to drop readings altogether but oddly, 々 has to go in the kanji field, whereas whereas ゝ,ゞ,ヽ, and ヾ have to go in the reading field.
Therefore, in order to keep this we need a reading.
I'd go with のま/ノマ only, given that we have an actual source for it.
I don't think we need "noma" as a gloss. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,9 +7,0 @@
-<reb>くりかえし</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おなじ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おなじく</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -20 +11,2 @@
-<reb>どうのじてん</reb>
+<reb>ノマ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -24,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>noma</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous character</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2213370">同の字点</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous kanji</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2018-01-30 09:21:33 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijs only has this as ”のま/ノマ" - sources for the other
readings? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>repetition of kanji (sometimes voiced)</gloss>
+<gloss>noma</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous character</gloss> |