| 7. |
A 2020-03-23 23:20:47 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
No need to apologise. The scope of the field tags is something that the editors are currently discussing so we should have a clearer policy on this at some point in the not too distant future. |
| 6. |
A* 2020-03-22 22:52:37 Guillem Palau-Salvà
|
| |
Comments: |
Ok, sorry for the inconviniance. I'll be more strict. |
| 5. |
A 2020-03-22 21:08:44 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
It's not music terminology. I don't think we should be tagging entries like this. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<field>&music;</field> |
| 4. |
A 2020-03-22 10:57:09 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 3. |
A* 2020-03-22 04:56:43 Guillem Palau-Salvà
|
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&music;</field> |
|
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
| 2. |
A 2019-05-15 10:07:50 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Cross-References
"Avoid adding cross-references to words which simply mean the same (or opposite), as it adds a lot of clutter to the entries without
necessarily being helpful to users." |
| |
Comments: |
We normally don't do xrefs just for synonyms but we sometimes do xrefs from less common synonym→more common synonym. 歌劇 only gets 1/3 of
the ngrams of オペラ so I guess this xref is fine, even if 歌劇 itself is also a quite common word according to the ngrams. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
| 1. |
A* 2019-05-15 09:59:05 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Comments: |
Per Marcus' comment on 2006945. I had no idea the direction of the xref mattered, since they seem to be reciprocal. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1035200">オペラ</xref> |