| 8. |
A 2020-02-19 00:09:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK. Done. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9,13 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>刺青</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>文身</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>黥</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>入墨</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26,12 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しせい</reb>
-<re_restr>刺青</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぶんしん</reb>
-<re_restr>文身</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>げい</reb>
-<re_restr>黥</re_restr> |
| 7. |
A* 2020-02-18 18:49:16 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
yes, it's overmerged, i think. i think this could be entirely split with いれずみ as a gikun reading on each of the others |
| 6. |
A* 2020-02-18 08:12:55 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, but I think the entry is rather over merged. 刺青 is mainly read しせい, with いれずみ as a gikun reading; just as 文身 is really ぶんしん, etc.
I think this should be broken into 4 entries. I know it's convenient to have the いれずみ/tattoo entry in one place but it's ended up a mess. If others agree I will do the split. |
| 5. |
A* 2020-02-17 11:03:18 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Comments: |
Is this order correct? k/m ngram counts show a higher count for 刺青 |
| 4. |
A 2019-03-24 08:27:57 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
| 3. |
A* 2019-03-24 05:28:30 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
... そのため、「タトゥー」と言う時は西洋的な絵や
文字の洋彫りを指し、「刺青」と言う時は日本的な絵や
文字の入った和彫りを指すことが多いが、本質的には、
タトゥーも刺青も同じもので、両者に違いはない。
https://chigai-allguide.com/入れ墨と刺青とタ
トゥー/ |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -42 +42 @@
-<gloss>tattoo</gloss>
+<gloss>tattoo (esp. a traditional Japanese one)</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2018-08-16 23:42:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
You are quite right. You flagged 剳青 back in 2007, but in those hand-edit days I stuffed up your correction.
剳青 was getting WWW hits in 2004, with pages dating back to the 1990s, so I doubt it was all due to EDICT. Interesting that several totally Japanese pages on tattoos use lists of terms obvious pasted from EDICT.
My kanwas have いれずみ as a kun reading of 黥, so it wouldn't be gikun. |
| 1. |
A* 2018-08-16 23:18:17 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, daij, gg5, etc. |
| |
Comments: |
iK is on the wrong one. the actual iK one (剳青) appears to be an edictism that was widely copied because it made it onto english wikipedia (and has since been removed). i see no reason to keep it
shinmeikai is the only source with 黥=いれずみ. it could be given its own entry as 黥[げい] with いれずみ as a gikun reading |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10,4 +10 @@
-<keb>入墨</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>剳青</keb>
+<keb>刺青</keb>
@@ -22,2 +19,2 @@
-<keb>刺青</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>入墨</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -45,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>tattooing</gloss> |