| 14. |
A 2020-02-09 02:17:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Quiet for a week - closing. |
| 13. |
A* 2020-02-02 23:45:06 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Daijr, etc. point にっぽん to にほん. |
| |
Comments: |
I'd say it's more formal, which often means it's used in more nationalistic contexts. I feel a note about that would be more of a clutter than anything really useful. Any other views? |
| 12. |
A* 2020-02-01 22:39:32 Nicolas Maia
|
| |
Comments: |
My teacher mentioned that the にっぽん reading often gives off a nationalistic overtone. Is it worth adding a note? Could be helpful. |
| 11. |
A 2016-10-14 09:36:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK. I'm suggesting a note on the ジャパン entry. |
| 10. |
A* 2016-10-14 08:13:16 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
not worth adding, imho |
|
(show/hide 9 older log entries)
|
| 9. |
A* 2016-09-27 03:49:38 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't know. It's REALLY rare and I feel it's giving it too much prominence to have it here with にほん and にっぽん. Kojien and Dajisen (AFAICT) don't mention it. If it were to go it it would need something like "ok". I suspect having it on the ジャパン entry in a note like "from じっぽん" might be better. |
| 8. |
A* 2016-09-27 02:38:29 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr also has
じっぽん【日本】
〔「日本」の字音読みから〕
ヨーロッパにおける日本の呼称の一。 〔日葡〕 |
| |
Comments: |
worth adding? |
| 7. |
A 2016-09-27 00:56:22 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, both result in a "P" in the edict versions. I'll put a message on the list about these. |
| 6. |
A* 2016-09-26 15:01:58 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Jim, a question:
Does [spec2] suffice for an entry to be considered common and marked with (P)? |
| 5. |
A 2016-09-26 11:45:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Indeed. |
| 4. |
A* 2016-09-26 05:37:45 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
ngrams 172512307 |
| |
Comments: |
strange |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri> |
| 3. |
A 2015-01-22 00:53:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think it's needed. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -23,4 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>Japanese</gloss>
-</sense> |
| 2. |
A* 2015-01-06 02:52:34 Marcus Richert
|
| |
Comments: |
I made a reference to the last edit in a posting to the
mailing list
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/edict-
jmdict/conversations/topics/5373
_
to summarize, I think we need to specify what exactly we
are using the adj-no pos for. |
| 1. |
A* 2015-01-05 05:10:16
|
| |
Comments: |
does this make any sense?
if it does, should all the other country entries be amended in the same manner? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>Japanese</gloss>
+</sense> |