JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2448420 Active (id: 2045157)

マリッジブルーマリッジ・ブルー
1. [n] Source lang: eng(wasei) "marriage blue"
▶ pre-nuptial doubts
▶ wedding blues
Cross references:
  ⇔ see: 2448430 ウェディングブルー 1. pre-nuptial doubts



History:
8. A 2019-07-23 05:24:12  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
OK. I yield.
  Diff:
@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-<reb>マレッジブルー</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マレッジ・ブルー</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
7. A* 2019-07-20 22:46:57  Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
I agree with Marcus. To me, "ik" indicates a common but incorrect/non-standard spelling. This isn't common and therefore should be ignored.
6. A* 2019-07-20 12:24:16  Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
  Refs:
マネジメント	3979744
マネッジメント	705

ストレージ	1376868
ストーレッジ	964
ストーレジ	168
ストーレージ	280
ストレジ 	249


ボクシング	1653052
ボックシング	55


マッキントッシュ	138203
マキントッシュ	186

ラジオ	11422706
ラッジオ	288
  Comments:
I think it's clutter. [ik] to me implies it's irregular, sure, but also that it still sees enough usage to be worth to include. You can just add 
random typos to plenty of words (see references) and get more hits than マレッジブルー does. I think the cons outweigh the pros of including rare 
typos. It's messy.
5. A 2019-07-20 08:00:44  Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
I wouldn't create an entry for it alone, but I see no reason for excluding it from an existing entry, noting it's not regular.
4. A* 2019-07-20 06:34:41  Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
  Comments:
Is 117 hits really above the worth-to-
include threshold? I don't think it is.
(show/hide 3 older log entries)

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml