| 5. |
A 2019-05-04 12:19:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 4. |
A* 2019-05-04 09:56:14 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1047821215
https://www.weblio.jp/content/こんだけ |
| |
Comments: |
Our これ・あれ・それ=だけ entries are currently all over the place. [n-t], [exp,adj-no], or just [adj-no]. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2008160">これだけ</xref>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial> |
| 3. |
A* 2019-05-04 09:35:00 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
あんだけ has an xref to あれほど which is marked adv,adj-no. I think that fits here too (and for あんだけ、そんだけ)? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos> |
| 2. |
A 2019-05-04 01:29:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
こんだけ 371373
こんだけな 751
こんだけの 24811
こんだけに 914 |
| |
Comments: |
I'd stick with adj-no. |
| 1. |
A* 2019-05-03 14:23:17 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
あんだけ 198146 (already an entry)
そんだけ 192777 (already an entry, might
need some revising/aligning)
こんだけ 371373 |
| |
Comments: |
Not sure if exp adj-no is.exactly right
but I got it from the あんだけ entry.
Seems like botb are adverbs to me. |