| 4. |
A 2019-03-05 06:25:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
ランダムな 122305
ランダムの 29155 |
| |
Comments: |
Historical sloppy marking, really. A lot of people use の when it should really be な, but I think just adj-na is appropriate. |
| 3. |
A* 2019-03-05 04:43:30 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
9-ish tweets containing "ランダムなこと" past week
0 non-bot tweets for "ランダムのこと" same period |
| |
Comments: |
Is there a reason this was "adj-na, n, adj-no"? I've seen this on a lot of older entries but I think it would make more sense to order
the PoS together, e.g. "adj-na, adj-no, n" (where both really do apply). |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos> |
| 2. |
A 2018-03-23 13:14:30 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
| 1. |
A* 2018-03-23 12:09:06 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr/s |
| |
Comments: |
Added sense. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1140090">ランダムサンプリング</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>random sampling</gloss>
+</sense> |