| 15. |
A 2018-07-08 12:50:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK. I'll strip the verb conjugation code from the 10 entries listed in comment 10 below. |
| 14. |
A* 2018-06-27 21:06:55 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
reopen |
| 13. |
A 2018-06-27 21:06:42 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
what a pain. ok, well i'll approve what you're suggesting and then reopen because there are a ton of entries for this in the queue |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos> |
| 12. |
A* 2018-06-26 12:46:18 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
信用できない 305779
信用できる 262320 |
| |
Comments: |
When "adj-f" first emerged and got described as "noun or verb acting prenominally" I think I had in mind that the verb would either not be conjugating or was conjugated already, as in 得も言われぬ or ああいった. Then along comes 信用できる/信用できない and mucks things up. I'm very tempted to say that if a verb is usually prenominal, don't have a v1/v5x tag. I think that should work, and 信用できない can fend for itself. Of course 食べる doesn't get an "adj-f".
So, I guess I'm back to Marcus' earlier position, and drop the verb tag for these cases. |
| 11. |
A* 2018-06-25 20:01:42 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
seems like the adj-f is unneeded. e.g., 食べるもの means 'things to eat', but we don't mark 食べる or any other verb as adj-f. i suggest adj-f not be used anywhere that it's tagged as a verb |
|
(show/hide 10 older log entries)
|
| 10. |
A* 2018-06-18 05:32:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
There are 10: 骨の有る, 超のつく, 不注意による, 風薫る, 風光る, 現在に至る, イケてる, 顔が見える, 信用できる, 信頼のおける.
I don't mind signalling that they conjugate (v1/v5x) and are usually pre-nominal )adj-f). |
| 9. |
A* 2018-06-18 03:38:46 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
we're getting into questionable pos territory here. this is definitely an [exp] as well. i could be wrong, but i don't think we have many entries that are marked as both a verb and an adj-f. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos> |
| 8. |
A* 2018-06-15 11:33:55 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I wouldn't expect 信用できない to be used so prenominally.
I think it should stay. |
| 7. |
A* 2018-06-15 07:58:23 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Didn't mean to self-approve. |
| 6. |
A 2018-06-15 07:17:13 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
the numbers for 信用できない were supposed to be 10／90 ie mostly non-prenominal use |
| 5. |
A* 2018-06-15 00:56:29 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think this is almost always prenominal, looking at twitter hits.
prenominal use / not prenominal use
信用できる 60/40
信用できない 90/10
(percent, looked at maybe 20 or so of each)
I still think this is a better entry than "使用できる" though because the translation is at least good. |
| 4. |
A 2012-12-14 05:35:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I've agonized over this one for several days. It's quite compositional, but since it's so common, and almost always prenominal, I think it's worth having. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1359620">信用・しんよう</xref> |
| 3. |
A* 2012-12-10 02:48:10 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Is this really necessary? It seems like an overly obvious
"a+b" to me. "Can"+"trust", "can"+"believe". Sure, it's
common, but so are loads of other できる forms of [vs] nouns
(maybe it does stand out though). If kept, I still don't
think it should be an adj-f since it's a verb and can be
conjugated as such:
"信用できない" 7m (b)
"信用できたら" 12k (b)
"信用できて" 17k (b)
The usage is also often very "verb-y": first result on
google: "ハローワークの求人テ本当に信用出来るんでしょうか?",
5th result: "教えて！ Watch - 楽天のレビューは信用出来る？" |
| 2. |
A 2012-12-10 00:21:09 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
"adj-f" is a catch-all here. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<pos>&v-unspec;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2012-12-06 18:56:36 winnie <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I've been looking through the part-of-speech table, but I can't figure out what the part of speech should be. It's a verb, but it is used as an adjective (信用できないこと）(信用できる政治家). |