JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary DatabaseEntriesSearch | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help |
1. |
[v5r,vt]
▶ to take over ▶ to capture ▶ to seize ▶ to commandeer ▶ to occupy ▶ to usurp |
|
2. |
[v5r,vt]
▶ to hijack (vehicle, account, etc.) |
8. | A 2018-06-10 06:00:35 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | Broaden, I think. |
|
Diff: | @@ -32 +32 @@ -<gloss>to hijack (a vehicle)</gloss> +<gloss>to hijack (vehicle, account, etc.)</gloss> |
|
7. | A* 2018-06-08 15:32:43 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | This is also used to mean "hijacking (a social media, etc. account)" aka "my twitter was hacked". Should we include this as a separate tense, or make sense 2 broader? Or just leave it out? |
|
6. | A 2017-05-04 00:20:35 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
5. | A* 2017-05-03 21:54:24 Robin Scott <...address hidden...> | |
Refs: | GG5, prog, daijr/s |
|
Comments: | Most of the refs have a separate hijack sense. I think we should do this as well, to show that the word isn't just being used figuratively. |
|
Diff: | @@ -21,0 +22 @@ +<gloss>to take over</gloss> @@ -23 +24 @@ -<gloss>to hijack</gloss> +<gloss>to seize</gloss> @@ -27,0 +29,5 @@ +<sense> +<pos>&v5r;</pos> +<pos>&vt;</pos> +<gloss>to hijack (a vehicle)</gloss> +</sense> |
|
4. | A 2012-10-30 10:20:07 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> | |
Comments: | Certainly not within the dictionary. It would be stretching things to have conjugations listed separately. In a morphologically heavy language like Japanese, where most of the verbs are very regular, I can't see any need for it. I could potentially do it in WWWJDIC, but I have chosen not to. The exception is in the Text Glossing, where it is done by invoking rules. If you put in "乗っ取れる", it says: Possible inflected verb or adjective: (potential or imperative) 乗っ取る 乗っ取る(P); 乗っとる 【のっとる】 (v5r,vt) to capture ... I think that's about as far as one can go. |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries) |