i agree that it should go.  in general, submitters should add an explanation or a reference though

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2834054">仕舞風呂</xref>

I agree with Marcus (and the anonymous submitter)
This seems like a perfectly normal compound, not a yoji
I think the Kanji Haitani list often throws the net a bit too wide

I think all jukugo's have to consist of only kango to 
qualify? daijs, 熟語: " 2字またはそれ以上の漢字で書かれる漢
語。" I'd have assumed 風呂 is a wago (though there's some 
debate on this: http://blog.goo.ne.jp/fenggu-
0958/e/bd49149535a4b2e0334cd51694c21caf )
_
Either way though, wasn't the point of the [yoji] to cover 
only the proverb-like 四字熟語 (instead of tagging them as 
[proverb]s)? Strictly speaking all 4-kanji can be called 四
字熟語 but if we cast the net that wide, is there any real 
point in having the tag in the first place?

???

And the reason for the edit is?

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>