6. |
A 2016-01-09 04:46:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I guess so. Without a specific etymology tag it's probably
best not there. GG5 and the other JEs don't mention it. |
5. |
A* 2016-01-08 18:00:50 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
The note is so vague that it is close to meaningless.
When and where was "originally"?
Asuka era? Han China? Ancient India? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<s_inf>originally temples were in the mountains</s_inf> |
4. |
A 2012-05-03 23:51:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>(main) temple gate</gloss>
+<gloss>main temple gate</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +23,1 @@
-<gloss>Buddhist temple</gloss>
+<gloss>temple</gloss> |
3. |
A* 2012-05-03 14:45:13 Nils Roland Barth <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
[fld=Buddh] |
|
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -21,0 +22,1 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field> |
2. |
A 2011-08-09 11:58:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I'm not entirely comfortable with the note, but I see both 大辞林 and 広辞苑 mention it. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
-<s_inf>So called because originally Buddhist temples were in the mountains.</s_inf>
-<gloss>main temple gate</gloss>
-<gloss>temple gate</gloss>
+<s_inf>originally temples were in the mountains</s_inf>
+<gloss>(main) temple gate</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos> |
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
1. |
A* 2011-08-06 00:59:39 Nils Roland Barth <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑 |
|
Comments: |
* Add more senses (*main* gate, temple itself)
* Explain etymology |
|
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<s_inf>So called because originally Buddhist temples were in the mountains.</s_inf>
+<gloss>main temple gate</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>Buddhist temple</gloss> |