8. |
A 2015-03-11 00:00:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I'm quite relaxed about including dropped-を constructions - anything (within reason) to help people, and there's always the text-glossing activities. Yes, I think we'd class it as an expression. |
7. |
A* 2015-03-05 09:41:28 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
nikk has 年食い, though not 年食う |
|
Comments: |
i've never been sure about including を-dropped forms. at some point you have to expect readers to be able to know what to look up. should this still be marked exp? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos> |
6. |
A* 2015-03-04 01:07:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I think it's worth having both. The を-dropped version is actually more common, according to the n-grams. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<reb>さいくう</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele> |
5. |
A* 2015-03-03 07:26:30 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
do we really need to include an を-dropped version of 年(と
し)を食う? the chiebukuro referenced says that "歳" is also
read as とし here, not さい |
4. |
A* 2015-03-02 11:07:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
N-grams. |
|
Comments: |
And while I'm at it... |
|
Diff: |
@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>年食う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>年喰う</keb>
@@ -20 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826896">年を食う・としをくう</xref> |
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
3. |
A* 2015-03-02 10:47:52 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I realise this could equally well be read としくう. I cannot find any support for either. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>としくう</reb>
+</r_ele> |
2. |
A 2015-03-02 10:38:59 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1426857684
N-grams. |
|
Comments: |
Clearly from 歳を食う, which in turn is the same as 年を食う |
|
Diff: |
@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歳食う</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826896">年を食う・としをくう</xref>
+<gloss>to grow older</gloss>
+<gloss>to advance in age</gloss> |
1. |
A* 2015-03-01 22:17:55 Rick Papo <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I can't seem to find a definition anywhere, but the context
seems to indicate extreme aging. I am actually fishing to
see if you guys have a better definition for this... |