| 4. |
A 2011-09-02 11:12:58 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
OK, I'll put it back. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos> |
| 3. |
A* 2011-09-02 02:22:41 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
i'm okay with [adj-no,n] and i've submitted that way. so those entries certainly exist already. fwiw, meikyo and nikk call this word a noun (although its primary use is certainly adj-no) |
| 2. |
A* 2011-09-01 22:37:49 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I'm not really comfortable with "adj-no,n". If it's a noun, I think that should be first. "adj-no" usually means "as well as being a noun, it works as an adjective with the genitive case particle", although there are cases where the word is really only an adjective.
In this case, I'm pretty sure it's not a noun, so I suggest dropping the "n", making it stay as an adjective alone. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos> |
| 1. |
A* 2011-09-01 12:49:18 Nils Roland Barth <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑 |
| |
Comments: |
* Reorder pos, so [adj-no] first – generally used as *modifier*
* Reword so *in* or *of* the prefecture, not the prefecture itself. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,2 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>prefecture</gloss>
+<gloss>in the prefecture</gloss>
+<gloss>prefectural</gloss> |