3. |
A 2010-12-01 21:45:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
2. |
A* 2010-12-01 18:29:24 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
that's still true, but never mind. as long as the first gloss for each is:
霧=fog
靄=mist
霞=haze
i think we're fine |
|
Diff: |
@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1196510">霞・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1196510">霞・1</xref>
@@ -21,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>mist</gloss>
@@ -25,1 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>mist</gloss> |
1. |
A* 2010-12-01 17:59:57 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Refs: |
koj, daij, gg5 |
|
Comments: |
not a meteorological mist (=靄) |
|
Diff: |
@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1574130">靄</xref>
@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>spray</gloss> |