7. |
A 2010-08-30 05:37:29 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
that makes sense to me. |
6. |
A* 2010-08-30 02:16:07 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
I think the reading is りょう, as in エビ漁/エビりょう. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>しらすぎょ</reb>
+<reb>しらすりょう</reb> |
5. |
A* 2010-08-30 00:10:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
Email discussion with Hendrik. He wanted the 漁 dropped to make a しらす entry, but 白子/しらす is already there. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>白子漁</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002830">片口鰯・かたくちいわし</xref>
-<gloss>Japanese anchovy (Engraulis Japonica)</gloss>
+<gloss>fishing for young anchovy, sardines, etc.</gloss> |
4. |
A* 2010-08-29 23:08:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
The Engraulis Japonica has an entry already: カタクチイワシ 《片口鰯》 【かたくちいわし】 (n) (uk) Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonica) , so at the least this one needs an xref to it. I also suggest "Japanese anchovy" as the gloss, as しらす漁 is not the general term for anchovy in Japanese according to all my EJs. |
|
Diff: |
@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>anchovy (Engraulis Japonica)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002830">片口鰯・かたくちいわし</xref>
+<gloss>Japanese anchovy (Engraulis Japonica)</gloss> |
3. |
A* 2010-08-29 20:47:53 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
well, we already have an entry for しらす, so this shouldn't be changed to that |
|
Diff: |
@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>しらす漁</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>しらす</reb>
+<reb>しらすぎょ</reb> |
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
|
2. |
A* 2010-08-29 14:40:07 Hendrik
|
|
Refs: |
<pre>
Oddly enough, the only reference i could find is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89p00toDnOM
(although a good number of other sites carry this information, too, they all
point to the same source)
</pre> |
|
Comments: |
Maybe Jim Rose (sp?) can confirm this? :-)
白子? |
|
Diff: |
@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>しらす漁</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +5,1 @@
-<reb>しらすぎょ</reb>
+<reb>しらす</reb> |
1. |
A* 2010-08-29 14:37:14 Hendrik
|
|
Refs: |
<pre>
Oddly enough, the only reference i could find is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89p00toDnOM
(although a good number of other sites carry this information, too, they all point
to the same source)
</pre> |
|
Comments: |
Maybe Jim Rose (sp?) can confirm this? :-) |