| 4. |
A 2010-08-06 04:37:13 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
okay |
| 3. |
A* 2010-08-05 23:25:41 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, 新和英中辞典 |
| |
Comments: |
Both these refs have 指貫き. I suggest dropping that "io". |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> |
| 2. |
A* 2010-08-05 20:09:25 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj, daijr, daijs, wiki and my IME only have 指貫 and 指ぬき
http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/nc/k19730618001/k19730618001.ht
ml |
| |
Comments: |
i think if anything 指貫き is the [io] version, actually. because it's set, and
because 貫き with the okurigana retains too much of its "verbness". e.g., the
government's okurigana guide distinguishes between 光り and 光. both are
correct okurigana, but in different situations. (just as 薩摩焼 would be
appropriate for "Satsuma-ware", whereas 薩摩焼き would be appropriate for
"Satsuma burning") |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>指貫き</keb>
+<keb>指貫</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,5 @@
-<keb>指貫</keb>
+<keb>指ぬき</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>指貫き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> |
| 1. |
A* 2010-08-05 10:40:03 Paul Blay <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
ルミナス和英辞典
スーパー大辞林 |
| |
Comments: |
Possibly 指貫 is io ? |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>指貫き</keb>
+</k_ele> |