| 4. |
A 2010-07-29 06:24:37 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典 |
| |
Comments: |
All these have "yam". |
| 3. |
A* 2010-07-29 03:35:40 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
not very, i think. all dics (and wikipedia) have this as a type of サトイモ, which is Colocasia esculenta (the taro/dasheen), whereas yams belong to genus Dioscorea. but perhaps it's a colloquial definition of yam somewhere on the planet (or perhaps a bunch of dictionaries just copied one another) |
| 2. |
A* 2010-07-28 10:50:49 Paul Blay <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
新和英大辞典 |
| |
Comments: |
Don't know how scientifically accurate 'yam' is, but a lot of dictionaries have it. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>yam</gloss> |
| 1. |
A* 2010-07-28 10:31:00 Brandon Kentel <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
http://www5.plala.or.jp/nijiya231-9288/Yasai_Kata/satoimo/satoimo_hinnsyu.htm |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>八頭</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>yam</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1550780">里芋</xref>
+<gloss>form of taro</gloss> |