jmnedict
5013061
Active
(id:
2298590)
<entry id="2298590" stat="A" corpus="jmnedict" type="jmnedict">
<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>5013061</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>イチロー</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<misc>&given;</misc>
<gloss>Ichirō</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<misc>&person;</misc>
<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-01-18 12:25:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>(esp. Suzuki Ichiro (baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>(esp. Suzuki Ichiro (baseball player))</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-01-18 15:57:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Ichiro-</gloss>
+<gloss>Ichirō</gloss>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>(esp. Suzuki Ichiro (baseball player))</gloss>
+<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (baseball player) (1973.10.22-)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-23 13:54:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I prefer this format. Should we maybe enshrine it in policy?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (baseball player) (1973.10.22-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-24 07:25:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Looks fine.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-16 23:30:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-18 11:21:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>For Japanese names we put the family name first. Please make a case for such a change.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-19 13:29:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Wait, do we? I've been operating under the assumption the preferred order was the opposite one, for ages. I've flipped the order on 10s if not 100s of entries throughout the years.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-19 14:58:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've been flipping orders as well.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>jmnedict 5358841
>> A* 2024-02-13 09:16:07 Marcus Richert
>> And we still do Western name order for people alive during and after Meiji, don't we?</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-19 15:04:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>From a fork:
>> A* 2024-04-19 15:01:21 Robin Scott
>> I thought we put the given name first for anyone born after the Meiji era.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-19 22:45:38" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, putting it back, but we probably should document this properly somewhere.
(https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/30)</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>