<entry id="2297699" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2524100</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>Ｔｗｉｔｔｅｒ</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ツイッター</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ツィッター</reb>
<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&tradem;</field>
<gloss>Twitter</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-11-14 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-27 22:10:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not really a computing term.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-&lt;field&gt;&amp;comp;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-27 22:18:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-29 00:52:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I wouldn't really say "ik" for this.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ツイッター	4582
ツィッター	233</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ツィッター&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-15 02:42:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>if ツイッター is official in some way, then it would be ik, but they appear to brand as Twitter in japanese, so who knows

should be a proper noun?  does this need some kind of other kind of indicator to show it is a company, or is that for enamdict only?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-pr;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-15 03:38:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-16 08:36:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If this is how they're branded, we should probably include it.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://japanese.engadget.com/2019/05/14/twitter/
"Twitter、ワクチン関連検索で厚労省へのリンクを表示"
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/fukayomi/20180426-OYT8T50014/
"Ｆａｃｅｂｏｏｋ（フェイスブック）やＴｗｉｔｔｅｒ（ツイッター）、Ｉｎｓｔａｇｒａｍ（インスタグラム）などのＳＮＳを眺めていると、旅行先から投稿した
「温泉なう」や、「これから１週間ハワイに行ってきます！」といった投稿をよく見かける。"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;Ｔｗｉｔｔｅｒ&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-21 02:34:34" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-17 02:52:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"n-pr" to "n" conversion.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-pr;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-11 17:33:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Judging from web hits, ツィッター is far less common than ツイッター. I think it can be hidden.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-11 18:13:34" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Sankoku, smk, shinsen have "商標名" tags.
We're also using the [tradem] field tag for things like windows, chatgpt, android, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;tradem;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-11 20:30:14" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>