<entry id="2297517" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2430460</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>顆粒剤</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かりゅうざい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>granules (medicine)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-02-17 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-09 01:43:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I wanted to tag this as [pharm] but it's more of a pharmacy term than a pharmacology one.
I'd say the same about a couple of entries already tagged as [pharm] (e.g. 頓服, 低用量).
We changed the description of [pharm] from "pharmacy" to "pharmacology" soon after adding the tag. I'm now thinking it might be helpful to have tags for both fields. Alternatively, we could just not use a tag for pharmacy terms. There aren't that many of them.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5: 顆粒剤　【薬】 granules.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;granule&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;pellet&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;granules (medicine)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-09 01:59:51" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Or we could use a common tag for both pharmacy and pharmacology.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>