<entry id="2295050" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2331270</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>マイクロソフト</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&comp;</field>
<gloss>Microsoft</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2008-05-24 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-17 10:51:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suppose Edict entries like this should be copied to enamdict?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-17 19:06:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>No harm having them in both.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-18 22:18:09" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think we need this in jmdict.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-18 23:38:59" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>No. JMnedict is enough.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>