<entry id="2293697" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1742540</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>超伝導</keb>
<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>超電導</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf12</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ちょうでんどう</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf12</re_pri>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>superconductivity</gloss>
<gloss>super-conductivity</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-05-03 07:32:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Merging.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijirin, ルミナス, etc. have these merged. 超伝導 wins on Googits</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,0 +4,4 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;超伝導&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -13,0 +17,1 @@
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;
@@ -17,0 +22,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;super-conductivity&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-05-03 22:28:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-05 08:33:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>penname01</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daijr, meikyo, shinkoku</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;esp. 超伝導 in physics, 超電導 in engineering&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-05 23:52:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I can't see any reference differentiating in meaning between the kanji forms. I suspect it's more a matter of user preference.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ルミナス and Daijirin have combined headwords; GG5 only has 超伝導 but online has 超電導 as "sK".
超伝導	191855	68.5%
超電導	88078	31.5%</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-06 23:04:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Meikyo has a note but most refs make no such distinction. I don't think the note is needed.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>meikyo: 工学系では「超電導」、物理学では「超伝導」を使うことが多い。</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-08 03:33:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't either. I can't see any differentiation in actual usage.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;esp. 超伝導 in physics, 超電導 in engineering&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>