JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2860153 Deleted (id: 2292495)
<entry id="2292495" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2860153</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ゟ</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>より</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&unc;</pos>
<misc>&obs;</misc>
<gloss>historical kana ligature of yo and ri</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2024-02-08 06:22:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Pieter Anders</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Maybe the entry should redirect to より? Anyway, I think that all kana ligatures should eventually be in the JMdict, just like the obsolete kana such as ゑ. Although dated, they're part of Japanese and of Unicode. They can be seen in the wild.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yori_(kana)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%9F
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kana_ligature</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-02-18 01:14:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think we can regard the Unicode ゟ ligature as a reading. Maybe this will work. (The database software doesn't like it being treated as a kanji either.)</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;ゟ&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -5 +8 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;ゟ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;より&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -10 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;kana ligature of よ and り: より (historical kana)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;historical kana ligature of yo and ri&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-02-20 01:40:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This makes it look like a kanji with the reading より. I think it either needs to be a reading or put in a note on the より entry (where it could be added as an sk form so that it's searchable).
Since it's kana, I don't think there's any issue with putting it in the readings field.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-02-24 10:15:31" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, as suggested I've added it as an [sk] reading in the より entry (1013190).
It's an odd one - it's the sole ligature in the Unicode hiragana block. AFAIK it's not in the JIS kana tables.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml